FiveTech Software tech support forums

... := nil But that is not the point. We need to understand why 'wrkdat' field's structure is read wrongly. More surprising is that this is behaving differently on different PCs (configurations) and also differently between FWH2307 and 2310. Right now, I can not figure out whats happening ...

... my machine for many years ... A couple of weeks ago the same thing happened and Antonio was able to confirm that his version ( same as mine ) was behaving the same way .. http://forums.fivetechsupport.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=40649 What was interesting enough .. the next day .. Resedit just ...

... this code produces a wrong image like this: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/xq90/924/pZtWka.png Till FWH1906, RoundBox() was behaving wrongly by - treating nTop as nLeft and nLeft as nTop - treating nBottom as nRight and nRight as nBottom. This is the only method with this ...

... - TXBrwColumn: New method AnchorToCell( oDlg/oControl) The dialog / control is aligned to bottom of the active cell. - Fix: lFitGridHeight is not behaving correctly when lFooter is .t. Fixed. - New data nClrBorder: When lDrawBorder is set to .t., border is drawn using nClrBoder if specified. Default ...

... - TXBrwColumn: New method AnchorToCell( oDlg/oControl) The dialog / control is aligned to bottom of the active cell. - Fix: lFitGridHeight is not behaving correctly when lFooter is .t. Fixed. - New data nClrBorder: When lDrawBorder is set to .t., border is drawn using nClrBoder if specified. Default ...

... cdx to any of us by mail and we shall try to find solution for this. Case 2: If this works correctly, then we shall all explore together why is it behaving differently in your environment.

... .. On one hand you have potential virus corruption ( for non opened tables ) .. on the other hand you could have index corruption with badly mis-behaving workstations. If it were me, the customer needs to understand they were a victim of their own 'self infliction' and should bear the brunt and ...

Antonio,

Excellent! Great work

Now we need feedback from users. How is your app behaving with it ?

... from some users (probably with some older installations) they were having problems with numeric field type. It is worth verifying how this is behaving with money and double field types. If you are getting this error with all three field types then we need to examine other reasons like localization, ...

... integer after editing. I do not say that there is any problem with Harbour. It is just that xbrowse's edit of numerics without picture clause is behaving diferently with xHarbour and Harbour. I am looking into xbrowse code and yet to come up with a satisfactory answer. Meanwhile I suggest a workaround ...

Antonio, Have these FWH libs for MSVC been built with VS 2012 instead of VS 2010 as the readme.txt states? It is behaving as though this is the case, it works fine for me with 2012 but with 2010 I get errors of the following sort, this is from the sample xbincflt.prg: fivehc32.lib(DEVICE.obj) ...

Marco,

The source code looks fine, so there should not be any leaks.

Is it behaving fine ?

... get changes the picture of second get to 3 dec.places. After the valid clause changes the picture of second get, I observed that the second get is behaving exactly the same way as if the changed picture was set originally. This is the screen shot initially. First get has input focus. http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/2935/getpic1.jpg ...

... So, normally I use -w1 and use -w2 occasionally for the purpose of removing unwanted declarations in the code. I find both Harbour and xHarbour behaving the same way. Am I missing something? xHarbour offers -wb- to disable unused codeblock parameters warning. EMG

... So, normally I use -w1 and use -w2 occasionally for the purpose of removing unwanted declarations in the code. I find both Harbour and xHarbour behaving the same way. Am I missing something?