FiveTech Software tech support forums

... is great news! :-) 2. webview.dll way of working does not follow the original Microsoft WebView2 implementation, so we are still working to find compatibility with FWH Class TWebView that is why we have decided, in the meantime, to implement a new Class TWebView2 until we make it as much compatible ...

... and Pix2Unit, or may not need at all because of the cUnits parameter on most print methods. Using cUnits parameter is the best option. That keeps compatibility between Pdf class and Printer class. For now you can start creating PDF files with FWH without HaruPdf. This command PRINT oPrn FILE cFilePDF ...

... starting on Mod_harbour. I have some doubts? can you help me? 1. FWH[Encrypt/Decrypt] ? because I have an app. Desktop [FHW] I want to maintain compatibility [Hb_decrypt / SX_Decrypt ] -> It is not compatible 2. Is there any [Rdd.] for MySQL or Samples, Query/[Fields] Read data and load into ...

... my last knowledge update in January 2022, PyTorch 1.10.0 supports Python 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, and 3.9. You can check the PyTorch website for the latest compatibility information. Use the Correct Pip Command: Ensure you are using the correct pip command based on your system and whether you want to install ...

MSC is a great compiler, very fast and produce very little EXEs. I tried those EXEs even on Windows Vista and they worked fine. So there is no compatibility problem with MSC. So, it must be a problem with my memory sticks. But if we had a Borland version with xHarbour, we wouldn't have this doubt, ...

MSC is a great compiler, very fast and produce very little EXEs. I tried those EXEs even on Windows Vista and they worked fine. So there is no compatibility problem with MSC.

... "D" for descending sort. Or, this parameter can be a codeblock also. Default: Ascending sort Param.2 lRecurse: Default .f. for backward compatibility If set to .T. all subtrees are also sorted Param.3 nCol: Default 0: Sorts on nCol of Cargo Array * TreeItem: oItem[ n ] returns oItem:Cargo[ ...

Dear Silvio As I told you in my email, please do not modify the class in this way to ensure compatibility with older developments. The best way to do it would be to add the lRefresh parameter in both methods METHOD Del( nPos, lRefresh ) CLASS TBar   local ...

... it is not natively supported on Linux. However, there are some workarounds that may allow you to use OLE objects on Linux: Use Wine: Wine is a compatibility layer that allows you to run Windows applications on Linux. You can try installing and running a Windows application that supports OLE ...

I was sure you would write this. I need it for back compatibility.

Yes, the latest FWH I have is FWH1912. In this particular module, I have sub-classed TDatabase and override :append() and :blank() method method append(lBlank) class TData  local lRet := .f.  default lBlank := .t.  if ( ::cAlias )->( add_rec() )     if lBlank      ...

We do not like any user to face any inconvenience by upgrading FWH. 1st point: This was a deliberate change we made to avoid some common problems. We can explain but at some other time. For now, we will make some changes in the database.prg to continue the old behavior I will post the changes in my ...

... there any flag to get the old behaviour? I do not wish to have fingers pointed to me after linking in the latest FWH that I have because backward-compatibility was broken and causes either data integrity issues or run-time error occurs TIA

... processorArchitecture="amd64" --- i recommend to use "DPIAWARE" so it will NOT depend on Windows "Scale" also "compatibility" (GUID for supportedOS) and "trustInfo" should be IHMO in Manifest

Some notes that may help you. Please treat the syntax: ADD TO oBrw for creating columns as obsolete. This command was created many years back for compatibility with TCBrowse for easier migration from TCBrowse to TXBrowse. Same way, please do not use the FIELDS clause for similar reasons. Instead ...