FiveTech Software tech support forums

... <return=a6a6877f-9091-400a-9ea7-e096b9307ca7@http://cl/zofri/sve/prd/wsn> %PDF-1.4 %âãÏÓ 5 0 obj <</Type/XObject/ColorSpace[/Indexed/DeviceRGB 255( € € €€ €€ € €€€€€ü ÀÀÀÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿ)]/Subtype/Image/BitsPerComponent 8/Width 1/Length 9/Height 1/Filter/FlateDecode/Mask ...

... Mr. Venken OrdWildSeek( cSeek, ... ) is actually an (x)Harbour function in DBFNTX and DBFCDX RDDs, applicable for indexed DBFs. We can seek expressions like "*A?C" The above post refers to similar functionality we created in FWMaria library for MySql tables. ...

hi, Looks like you set oBrw:bSeek := nil We recommend not to. Instead oBrw:bSeek can be { || .f. } When the dbf is not indexed or not set to any index, the inbuilt bSeek returns .F. YES, i have try to SET bSeek to NIL my "Problem" was that i have many DBF which work with ...

... Eval( ::bSeek, ... ) Looks like you set oBrw:bSeek := nil We recommend not to. Instead oBrw:bSeek can be { || .f. } When the dbf is not indexed or not set to any index, the inbuilt bSeek returns .F. Till FWH2206, Incremental seek was always on by default. From FWH2212, we can disable ...

... Line numbers are not matching with FWH2212 xbrowse.prg, unless modified. Are you using Incremental Filter or Seek? Incremental seek works only for indexed DBF, when an index is selected. i do NOT use any Index and that OEM DBF have no *.CDX i "just" play with "SET DBFLOCKSCHEME" ...

... give me this https://i.postimg.cc/j204FFb5/ko.png it looks like it does the group but then it doesn't, it looks like it's not indexed but actually i index the odbf file but maybe not the oBrw it gets the data from I tried to add on MySetUp() function also these lines but not ...

Version of FWH?
Line numbers are not matching with FWH2212 xbrowse.prg, unless modified.
Are you using Incremental Filter or Seek?
Incremental seek works only for indexed DBF, when an index is selected.

... depends mostly how you are getting the data. If you are using a filter, it will be agonizingly slow (as filters always are). If you are using an indexed scope it will be very fast. Some time ago I did some tests regarding this using a large database and it took 0.32 seconds to collect 20,543 ...

... in the scrollbar and moving to the position of the hand I can resume the track with the mouse. How do you think I can solve it? the database is indexed with three indexes 1) DTOS(DATA)+CONCORSO 2) VAL(CONCORSO) 3) DATA I also tried with setorder (0) @ 20, 5 SCROLLBAR oScrollDbf HORIZONTAL  SIZE ...

... all the archives and then populate them during the conversion. The archives were all opened with Tdatabase and therefore in share Archives are indexed with the! Deleted () clause I don't know how to do the zeroing of archives and the dbpack since it cannot be done in Tdatabase I don't know ...

... button that calls : Marc_Setfilter() I know that Filters to work good should be optimised (from posts), but many times the search fields are not indexed, So this is not good I think. (this become a speed issue) Maybe I should reconsider this total function and make a dialog filter system where ...

Antonio

Two things :
1) Encrypt your database field and index on that field
2) encrypt the value of your variable you are going to use in your search ..

Now you can search an encrypted value against your indexed encrypted field in your .dbf .. I do it all the time ...

Rick Lipkin

... inserts an empty record as you can see here https://i.postimg.cc/jd0QGbyr/frfr.png Now you see it at the bottom because the dbf is indexed but I thing the procedure insert the Empty record at init

... it should work with 17.09 also. But as we can see from your code, autosort should not work either with 12.04 or 17.09. Even assuming the DBF is indexed on all fields, how do you expect XBrowse to know which Index is to be used for which columnn? In the above code, we should add the clause SORT ...

... remain so in modification, I thought of it in this way also to create labels with barcodes and qr code. I don't use any IDs the reserva file is indexed on ROOMS_ID + DToS (CHECK_IN) >If you re-read the paragraph you are referring to, I said that if you are REMOVING days from a reservation ...