FiveTech Software tech support forums

... xharbour and harbour have their already known differences, it is too complex to build a simple example, it seems that the solution would be to migrate to Harbour and MSVC, But for legacy systems it's a nightmare. it seems that the solution would be to migrate to Harbour and MSVC, im already ...

... of its design or the underlying system architecture. You noted that using object-oriented programming (OOP) syntax may make it easier to migrate to a different backend or database engine.

Good day. I'm trying to migrate to bcc760 and xharbour new version, but it's giving this error:     C:\bcc760\BIN\BCC32 -M -c @B32.BCEmbarcadero C++ 7.60 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993-2023 Embarcadero Technologies, Inc.obj\FastRepH.c:Warning ...

Mr Nages, where i can find one guide to migrate ads files to fwmaria, can i use the same syntax ? i use ads and tdatabase, can i only convert and open files using fwmaria and use the code with syntax or i have to change all? i can use an local ...

Mr Nages, where i can find one guide to migrate ads files to fwmaria, can i use the same syntax ? i use ads and tdatabase, can i only convert and open files using fwmaria and use the code with syntax or i have to change all? i can use an local ...

thanks, now work fine. I tried several times migrate to VS2022, read posts on the forum but I use a portable ssd, I need something like: VS2022/x32/bin/include/lib VS2022/x64/bin/include/lib I saw that vs2022 despite changing the directories, vs2022 ...

Dear Ari,

To use such code you have to use Harbour and can't use xHarbour

Our advise is that you migrate to Harbour

Hi guys, I'm trying to migrate a module that I have to FWH+Harbour instead of xHb However this line of code generates RTE under Harbour but ran fine all this while under xHb  ::oSheet := ::oExcel:ActiveSheet ::oSheet:set("Name", ...

Time to migrate to Harbour. Forget about xHarbour, follow my advise

And what is the reason, xHarbour will cease to be supported? It is sad.. I liked xHarbour more than Harbour. And what (sorry for the offtop) in the version in FWH2206 it is possible to work with webview2 via xHarbour?

Dear Yuri,

Time to migrate to Harbour. Forget about xHarbour, follow my advise

... Add that this version is prepared to be used also in Mod-Harbour Comments received: "It is much, much faster" It is time for us to migrate to 64 bits. //------------------------------------------- SPANISH ---------------------------------------- Aquí tenéis la librería de Daniel ...

... Well here is a solution for this scenario and it is mod_harbour. I really don't think that someone with an application from years ago should "migrate" to the web, but perhaps if it can "relate" to the web, taking advantage of the benefits of each ecosystem. I can tell you that ...

... need of a new programming tool at all. It's a completely different situation if compared with the migration from DOS to Windows. Nobody needs to migrate anywhere today. The partial migration did already take place decades ago. EMG Enrico, Otto meant that now it is possible to use Harbor functions ...

... need of a new programming tool at all. It's a completely different situation if compared with the migration from DOS to Windows. Nobody needs to migrate anywhere today. The partial migration did already take place decades ago. EMG

... but what's the problem with that? Well, the problem is that basically mysql_* functions are deprecated and to avoid troubles it is recommended to migrate it to mysqli_* functions... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySQLi This migration process is not THAT complicated, it's pretty simple ...