Unfortunately, that did not resolve the problem. I also took the the .prg file and moved it to the top of the list so it didn't pick up any redefines from other files as it was compiling ( if that's a thing ). It still has the same, original, error with that seek( x, y ) function. It doesn't ...
hi, It has to have an id other than -1 to be able to assign redefines Change RC with an ID. i can´t change ID while it is from Windows ;) i use that "search/replace" Dialog which e.g. Notepad.EXE have based on c:\fwh\source\classes\dlgfind.prg ...
Dear Hua, If I properly understood you, you have to do the following: 1. use "RichEdi5.ch" instead of "RichEdit.ch" 2. Do the REDEFINEs this way: REDEFINE RICHEDIT5 ::hoGets["edu_1"] VAR ::hGets["edu_1"] ID 301 OF ::oFolder:aDialogs[1] BARBUTTON Please notice ...
In the case of REDEFINEs, the right place to define upper/lower case is the RC file. Please add the styles ES_UPPERCASE or ES_LOWERCASE in the rc file for the Gets you want. The only thing we can provide for REDEFINEs is Proper case. ...
brakaman: Cuando defines un recurso vía editor de recursos se puede apreciar que cada recurso tiene un nombre y un índice (Name y TAB INDEX), el nombre es el que utilizamos dentro de nuestro código, por ejemplo REDEFINE GET aGetsF1[04] VAR oCia:CUR ID 104 OF oFld:aDialogs[1] UPDATE; PICTURE "@!...
Hola amigos: Creo que sera problema mio, pero al final despues de haber hecho tantos cambios me queda la dua. ¿Tiene algo que ver cuando hacemos REDEFINE GET .... ó REDEFINE SAY etc. el orden en que lo tecleamos dentro del DIALOG, ? ¿Se tienen que teclear por orden del ID, ejemplo el ID de un GET qu...
La diferencia entre ambas clases es que la clase TRichEdit5 es más moderna y utiliza otra DLL: MsftEdit.dll, y el control en los redefines es RichEdit50W, contiene más métodos y funcionalidades. Bien, en cuanto a lo que necesitas, ahora si te he entendido Cambia en el código del ejemplo ...
Antonio, in REDEFINE CHECKBOX and REDEFINE COMBOBOX (maybe also in other REDEFINes) is no clausula FONT. Would be nice to have! Another idea: A WHEN-clausula which triggers a :hide() (or :show()) from the control!
... libs from the list. So we have to find the reason why 2.4 MB of FWH modules are linked but not used. The only reason I can think of is that FWH redefines some of the xHarbour symbols. Which is your linker name ? ilink32. But that's irrelevant. EMG
Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:Please note that I'm not using any Harbour functions in my sample so EXE size should not increase even if FWH redefines any of those.
Allright, but note what increase problem is no a fwh problem or harbour problem: it's a C linker problem from Embarcadero company if you use Borland C++
... te das cuenta el tiempo que se pierde. Entonces estoy creando para compartirlo luego una aplicacion que lea un .RC y me genere en archivos TXT los redefines de los controles que ese .RC contenga. Gracias. https://1drv.ms/i/s!AptIZn_i9BHGyTQIG1fqi3Mkuyfb