FiveTech Software tech support forums

It appears you are using

Code: Select all  Expand view

oRowSet:ToExcel()

of FWMaria lib.
We will now include this code in TRY/CATCH block for future.

But we advise you to use oBrw:ToExcel() which is safer.

... https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/stringapiset/nf-stringapiset-widechartomultibyte It is safer to use FWH built-in functions to make properly working Unicode library.

... If you are working with Microsoft SQL oRs:Filter := "LDATE >= '2023-01-01' AND HDATE < '2023-02-01'" Note: It is safer to use "HDATE < (date + 1 )" than "HDATE <= (date)", because many RDBMS use datetime fields. How to easily generate ...

Hello friends, I have been using a static hash variable for some time now to partially replace local variables. It somehow feels safer to me when making changes to old source code. I don't need to declare the variables. I simply assign a value to the key, and then I have access to it throughout ...

... works with some languege installations of Excel, we need to write as "A1;D9" for some other language installations. So, it is safer to write it as : oRange := oShee:Range( oSheet:Cells( 1,1 ), oSheet:Cells( nLastRow, nLastCol ) ) 

Mr. Rao any news about this.

nageswaragunupudi wrote:

This error comes randomly

Surprising.

Anyway, we will try to make the function ExcelLangID() in olefuncs.prg safer.
We will get back on this subject.

karinha wrote:Master Enrico, I respect your opinion. Mine is that PECOMPACT even in older versions is much safer than UPX.exe.

What do you mean with "much safer". Much safer in what?

... don't see any reason to use PECOMPACT instead of UPX. Master Enrico, I respect your opinion. Mine is that PECOMPACT even in older versions is much safer than UPX.exe. Only my opinion. I'm very happy with it, and I won't go back to UPX.exe at all. hahahahahaha. Maestro Enrico, respeto su opinión. ...

This error comes randomly

Surprising.

Anyway, we will try to make the function ExcelLangID() in olefuncs.prg safer.
We will get back on this subject.

Hi,
I think DBF is not the future .

It is safer to use SQL with Access or MySQL or MS SQL

SQL is very very faster than DBF .

Have a good day ,

Philippe from Belgium

Dear Otto,

I think that 4 x 4 dots would be safer

Android uses it (I would say it is 4x4 also)

... I want to make my WINHOTEL extensions in the future with mod harbour since we can access the same databases. Thanks again. The call is much safer now. No bat-file - which you can change - in between. Best regards, Otto https://mybergland.com/fwforum/fwhandmh1.gif

... If you do it the right way, you get the right results. At least now discontinue the unsafe practice of using ctod(). Change to STOD() which is safer or use {^ dd/mm/yyyy }. You will save a lot of your time.

Hello friends,
Is it possible to setup APACHE that only prg files are executed?
I think a web server would be safer this way, because relatively few people know how to create prg pages.
Best regards,
Otto

aEval would be safer. Think of aArray := { 1, 2, { 1, 2, 3 }, 4}