FiveTech Software tech support forums

... applied to EVERY call. It will be clearer for the class user, otherwise the complex or 'tricky' behavoir should be very well documented, so my vote to KISS. :D An alternative would be to have extra methods to every type, like AddDate, AddNumber, etc. I've run my own test in an more than 10 ...

... Magazine to say it “could rank as the worst government data breach anywhere.” It is believed that the personal information of every single voter in the Philippines — approximately 55 million people — was compromised on March 27, 2016 by Anonymous; LulzSec Pilipinas published the database ...

... Magazine to say it “could rank as the worst government data breach anywhere.” It is believed that the personal information of every single voter in the Philippines — approximately 55 million people — was compromised on March 27, 2016 by Anonymous; LulzSec Pilipinas published the database ...

Gente; de lo leido, lo que encuentro de nuevo es esto: 12 down vote I resolved the problem by setting the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag in ilink32.exe. The original solution came from Hiroyuki Shimada, using editbin, and posted at http://qc.embarcadero.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=134775 ...

... us to override the default by defining a new font. Otherwise, we have to define the font for every dialog. James Yes, absolutely impractical. I vote for auto assign font too, if it's a viable solution. EMG

I vote for Jack's version:

STRTRAN(var," ","")

The simpler, the better.

I would like to add a vote for Colin's version of auto-indenting. This would save a lot of typing. Perhaps it should also be an option.

Vote..!

Tim,

that was just a vote for the further develpment of Fivedroid. In reality the market situations lead us to the decision for which OS we develop the programs.

The idea of Antonio sound great, to have one source for different operation systems. I hope it´s possible.

Lack many people still to vote. If you can help I appreciate it.

Davide,

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was just adding another vote for your comment. I think we all want to be able to specify CCs and BCCs.

It seems to be a very simple change so I think it is worth doing, and yes, we need backward compatibility.

James

Gilbert,

Ah, thanks for clearing that up. Then I vote for your change suggestion too.

Antonio?

Regards,
James

Antonio Linares wrote:My vote: gcc seems the best way to go

I agree.

Do you also offer libs for gcc in future now?

... Highly compatible with Microsoft C. Cons: It is not available for Windows Mobile, neither Linux, neither OSX. It does not support C++ code. My vote: gcc seems the best way to go, but actually most FWH users keep using Borland C :-)

The world really needs your vote!
http://www.project10tothe100.com