FiveTech Software tech support forums

... 49 /* Malformed telnet option */ #define HB_CURLE_OBSOLETE50 50 /* NOT USED */ #define HB_CURLE_PEER_FAILED_VERIFICATION 51 /* peer's certificate or fingerprint wasn't verified fine */ #define HB_CURLE_GOT_NOTHING 52 /* when this is a specific error */ #define HB_CURLE_SSL_ENGINE_NOTFOUND ...

... Advantage Database Server has two modes of operation. It has "local" and "remote". Local is free and is basically support for peer to peer. Although that is native to the DBFCDX RDD, if you use the LOCAL drivers, then all you have to do is add the actual Client Server software ...

... using them does speed up your operation a lot. My clients run all of their computers all day long, and are constantly interacting with the data. Peer to peer has it's issues, especially if the computers are Home OS rather than PRO. The networking is just much weaker. ADS removes that problem. ...

... be up and running. The program will be invoicing with a lot of Xbrowse use For my hardware setup i have a question : I have 5 Pc's in network (peer to peer) with 3 Pc's Win7 32Bit and 2 Pc's Win7 64 bit. (FWH32 I decided to buy, because I need 32 bit pc's for other software) Now, What would ...

... named libads.so. ALS: The Advantage Local Server allows Advantage applications access to data files located locally, in shared environments, or in peer-to-peer environments. The Advantage Local Server is a non-client/server solution and can be used to access data on the local computer or on a shared ...

... using ADO with Access in that you do not have to worry about record locking or legacy 'opportunistic' problems that plague .dbf on Local area or peer to peer networks. Another nice thing is that you can blend DBFCDX and ADO together in the same application. I like Sql for transactional data storage ...

... ADS. That's a good option for those people who use the ADS Server. However, in my tests, I'm seeing much better performance on a network ( peer to peer ) when using DBFCDX instead of the ADS Local server. I have both available, so I technically could use the ADS option ( I think ), but ...

... with 25 or less users and concurrent users of 10 or 15 at the most ( my personal setup .. sure that number can be significantly higher ) ... peer to peer would be a stretch and I would not recommend that setup. The reason I like Access is you do not need a connection client and the database ...

... dejar de buscar sustituir su DBF/CDX rdd ya que ahi no es el problema. Si buscas información sobre posibles causas de lentitud en una red local peer-to-peer de Windows seguramente llegues a una solución con mayor prontitud. Espero esto te sirva. Reinaldo.

... exceed 5 workstations. I don't want to play with configuring their systems, and ADS is quick and easy to install. I tell people to start with the Peer to Peer ( LOCAL ), but when they don't like the performance, I give them a 30 day free trial of ADS. No one complains about the price after they ...

... application, is just not reasonable. My clients usually have 2 to 5 workstations, but some may have 10 to 20. 1) Using DBFCDX is fine for small peer to peer operations, but how stable is it for larger systems ( and what is the reasonable limit ?) 2) Are there reliable alternatives for DBF Client ...

... does not prevent that from occuring. They continue to produce server products for local networks, and software that works in a small operation ( peer to peer ) or enterprise. Their tools are continuing to provide for desktop, and cloud, experiences. Metro interacts with cloud based data, but ...

No, non posso aiutarti. La mia era solo una domanda: perché pensi (se lo pensi) che il remote desktop non possa essere un'ottimo sostituto del peer to peer e del client/server?

EMG

... crash .. so goes your tables be it .dbf or .mdb. I would MUCH prefer Sql server .. however, this project will be for a small group of users on a peer to peer network.. Rick

Rimantas, I just did a test here on a peer-to-peer network and here are the times to open DBFs of different sizes. First test 100 records = 70 milliseconds 1 million records = 110 milliseconds Repeat test 100 records = 60 ms 1 million records ...