FiveTech Software tech support forums

Using this folder:

Code: Select all  Expand view

DEFINE DIALOG oWdlg1 BRUSH oBrush RESOURCE "WOMAINw" TRANSPARENT OF oWdlg TITLE cTitle
    REDEFINE FOLDEREX oFld ID 356 OF oWdlg1 ;
        PROMPT "   General   ", "   Parts   ", "   Labor   ", "   Recommend   ", "   Totals   ", "   Inspect   ", "   Costing   ", "  Services  ", "   Attachments   " ;
        DIALOGS "WOGENw", "WOPARw", "WOLABw", "WORECw", "WOTOTw", "WOINSw", "WOCSTw", "WOSVCw", "WOATTw" ;
        ON CHANGE ( oCurrentOrder:FolderCheck( oFld, oWorkParts, oWorkPartsr, oWorkLabor, oWorkLaborr, ;
          oWorkNeeds, oWorkNeedsr ), oWdlg1:update() ) ;
    ROUND 5 TRANSPARENT
        oFld:aGradUnSel := { { 0.50,16776960,16777215 }, { 0.50,16777215,16776960 } }
         oFld:aGradOverUnSel := { { 0.25, nRGB( 100, 149, 237 ), nRGB( 100, 149, 237 ) },{ 0.75,  16777215,16776960 } }
 

And the .rc:

Code: Select all  Expand view

WOMAINw DIALOG 0, 0, 850, 460
STYLE WS_POPUP | WS_CAPTION
CAPTION "Workorder Development Options"
{
    CONTROL                 "", 101, "TBar", 0|WS_CHILD|WS_VISIBLE, 0,0, 850, 30
    CONTROL         "",356,"TFolderex",WS_TABSTOP,5,35,840,420
    LTEXT           "",4001,550,10,150,13
}
 

The GET:

REDEFINE GET oWorkPartsr:parlbs PICTURE "99999.99" MESSAGE aMsg[ 79 ] ID 748 OF oFld:aDialogs[ 2 ] UPDATE
And .rc
EDITTEXT 748,100,85,50,10, ES_RIGHT | ES_MULTILINE

Built with FWH 16.06, cursor does not display in any fields that are numeric and right justified. It works correctly on dialogs that are not in a folder, and it works correctly for non-numeric fields. However, when clicking on a numeric field, the cursor will not show.

I have spent two days drilling down code, re-writing code, etc. with the same result. Any ideas would be appreciated.

Tim

Why ES_MULTILINE ?

That was the standard for years on numeric fields defined in an .rc. At one point it was a requirement. I can't tell you why, but it was.

I just commented it out, and the cursor re-appeared. It has worked perfectly for at least 15 years ... very strange.

TimStone wrote:That was the standard for years on numeric fields defined in an .rc.

For numerics values?, or only for memo fields ?

Whenever we wanted to right justify a numeric GET, that was the requirement. It goes back to my earliest days with FWH

Maybe Antonio has an answer.

Yes, it is possible but now it seems as it is no longer needed

That was a requirement for 16bit resources. No more for 32bit ones

EMG