lLock par. problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB - SOLVED
lLock par. problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB - SOLVED
Hi Mr. Rao,
Previous link is http://forums.fivetechsupport.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37700
Can you please test it?
Thanks,
Previous link is http://forums.fivetechsupport.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37700
Can you please test it?
Thanks,
Last edited by Horizon on Sun Apr 12, 2020 11:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Regards,
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
- nageswaragunupudi
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:22 am
- Location: India
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
We are working on this.
Kindly wait.
Kindly wait.
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
- nageswaragunupudi
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:22 am
- Location: India
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
Using the lLock parameter in the method EditBaseRecord() is not working satisfactorily.
We advise a different approach as in this following samples program. Please test and give your opinion.
We advise a different approach as in this following samples program. Please test and give your opinion.
Code: Select all | Expand
#include "fivewin.ch"
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------//
function Main()
local oCn, oRs, oDlg, oFont, oBrw
oCn := FW_DemoDB()
if oCn == nil
return nil
endif
oRs := oCn:RowSet( "SELECT ID,FIRST,CITY,SALARY FROM customer" )
DEFINE FONT oFont NAME "TAHOMA" SIZE 0,-14
DEFINE DIALOG oDlg SIZE 600,500 PIXEL TRUEPIXEL FONT oFont ;
TITLE "MARIADB LOCKED EDIT"
@ 60,20 XBROWSE oBrw SIZE -20,-20 PIXEL OF oDlg ;
DATASOURCE oRs AUTOCOLS ;
CELL LINES NOBORDER FASTEDIT
WITH OBJECT oBrw
:nEditTypes := EDIT_GET
:CreateFromCode()
END
@ 10,20 BTNBMP PROMPT "LockedEdit" SIZE 150,40 PIXEL OF oDlg FLAT ;
ACTION LockedEdit( oBrw )
ACTIVATE DIALOG oDlg CENTERED
RELEASE FONT oFont
return nil
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------//
static function LockedEdit( oBrw )
local oRsMain, oRsEdit, oRec, nWait, oCn
oRsMain := oBrw:oDbf
oCn := oRsMain:oCn
nWait := oCn:QueryResult( "SHOW SESSION VARIABLES LIKE 'innodb_lock_wait_timeout'" )[ 2 ]
oCn:Execute( "SET SESSION innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 1" )
oCn:BeginTransaction()
MsgRun( "Reading Record", "WAIT", { || ;
oRsEdit := oCn:RowSet( "SELECT * FROM customer WHERE ID = ? FOR UPDATE", { oRsMain:ID } ) ;
} )
if oCn:nError == 0
oCn:Execute( "SET SESSION innodb_lock_wait_timeout = " + cValToChar( nWait ) )
oRec := TDataRow():New( oRsEdit )
oRec:Edit()
oCn:CommitTransaction()
oRsMain:ReSync()
oBrw:RefreshCurrent()
else
oCn:RollBack()
oCn:Execute( "SET SESSION innodb_lock_wait_timeout = " + cValToChar( nWait ) )
? "Record is locked by other user"
endif
oBrw:SetFocus()
return nil
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------//
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
- nageswaragunupudi
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:22 am
- Location: India
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
Thanks for the feedback.
Now we have modified the method EditBaseRecord() in the above lines. In our tests, it is working as expected.
The modification is being released in FWH1910.
The last parameter lLock can be a codeblock also. When read fails, this codeblock is executed with oRs as parameter.
Now we have modified the method EditBaseRecord() in the above lines. In our tests, it is working as expected.
The modification is being released in FWH1910.
The last parameter lLock can be a codeblock also. When read fails, this codeblock is executed with oRs as parameter.
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
nageswaragunupudi wrote:Thanks for the feedback.
Now we have modified the method EditBaseRecord() in the above lines. In our tests, it is working as expected.
The modification is being released in FWH1910.
The last parameter lLock can be a codeblock also. When read fails, this codeblock is executed with oRs as parameter.
Thank you master.
Regards,
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
nageswaragunupudi wrote:Thanks for the feedback.
Now we have modified the method EditBaseRecord() in the above lines. In our tests, it is working as expected.
The modification is being released in FWH1910.
The last parameter lLock can be a codeblock also. When read fails, this codeblock is executed with oRs as parameter.
Hi Mr. Rao,
The last parameter lLock can be a codeblock also. When read fails, this codeblock is executed with oRs as parameter.
Have you changed this?
October, November, December 2019
Code: Select all | Expand
* FWMariaRowSet METHOD EditBaseRecord( cFieldList, lNew, bEdit, oBrw, lLock )
If lLock is set to .t. or a codeblock is specified, the record is locked while
reading and on failure to read, the codeblock is evaluated with the rowset as
parameter.
Till FWH1909, read is attempted with clause "LOCK IN SHARE MODE". This approach
was not giving the expected results as other users also are able to read the
record for lock and attempt to write was resulting in deadlock issues.
This is now modified to read with clause "FOR UPDATE". This change is working
as expected.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37928
Code: Select all | Expand
::oRs_View:EditBaseRecord( nil, .f., { |oRec| ::GO_DETAYS(lMoveState, oRec ) }, ::oBrw, {|oRs|Locked_Problem(oRs)} )
if we set to .T. or codeblock lLock parameter, it gives an error.
Code: Select all | Expand
Application
===========
Path and name: C:\PrgW_SQL\Icra\IcraW.exe (32 bits)
Size: ********* bytes
Compiler version: Harbour 3.2.0dev (r1904111533)
FiveWin version: FWH 20.02
C compiler version: Microsoft Visual C++ 19.20.27508 (32-bit)
Windows version: 6.2, Build 9200
Time from start: 0 hours 0 mins 6 secs
Error occurred at: 01/04/2020, 12:27:17
Error description: Error BASE/1081 Argument error: +
Args:
[ 1] = C SET @@TRANSACTION_ISOLATION = '
[ 2] = U
Stack Calls
===========
Called from: => CHARACTER:__OPPLUS( 0 )
Called from: .\source\internal\FWMARIA.PRG => FWMARIACONNECTION:INTRANSACTION( 6478 )
Called from: .\source\internal\FWMARIA.PRG => (b)FWMARIACONNECTION( 5644 )
Called from: .\source\internal\FWMARIA.PRG => FWMARIACONNECTION:BEGINTRANSACTION( 0 )
Called from: .\source\internal\FWMARIA.PRG => FWMARIAROWSET:EDITBASERECORD( 4888 )
Called from: .\TOb_Browse1_SQL.prg => TYK_LIST_SQL:GO_DETAY( 838 )
Regards,
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
- karinha
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: São Paulo - Brasil
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Contact:
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/set-transaction.html
https://docs.microsoft.com/pt-br/sql/t-sql/statements/set-transaction-isolation-level-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15
https://mariadb.com/kb/pt-br/isolation/
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/set-transaction/
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47575445/set-tx-isolation-versus-set-transaction-isolation-level
https://docs.microsoft.com/pt-br/sql/t-sql/statements/set-transaction-isolation-level-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15
https://mariadb.com/kb/pt-br/isolation/
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/set-transaction/
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47575445/set-tx-isolation-versus-set-transaction-isolation-level
João Santos - São Paulo - Brasil - Phone: +55(11)95150-7341
- nageswaragunupudi
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:22 am
- Location: India
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
Can you please try with .T. as the last parameter instead of codeblock?
Can you also let us know if you are using MySql or MariaDB and the version?
Can you also let us know if you are using MySql or MariaDB and the version?
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
Hi Mr. Rao,
Yes, I have tried. same error gives.
MariaDB 10.4.
Thanks.
nageswaragunupudi wrote:Can you please try with .T. as the last parameter instead of codeblock?
Yes, I have tried. same error gives.
Can you also let us know if you are using MySql or MariaDB and the version?
MariaDB 10.4.
Thanks.
Regards,
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
Hakan ONEMLI
Harbour & MSVC 2022 & FWH 23.04
- nageswaragunupudi
- Posts: 10733
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:22 am
- Location: India
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: New lLock parameter problem in EditBaseRecord() for MariaDB
I have tested maria15.prg with 5th parameter as .T. on 4 different servers:
MySql
5.5.18
5.6.39
8.0.17
and MariaDB
5.5.5-10.3.7-MariaDB.
I did not notice any problem with any of these servers.
Please suggest any changes you suggest in maria15.prg to reproduce the error.
MySql
5.5.18
5.6.39
8.0.17
and MariaDB
5.5.5-10.3.7-MariaDB.
I did not notice any problem with any of these servers.
Please suggest any changes you suggest in maria15.prg to reproduce the error.
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India