FiveTech Software tech support forums

cnavarro wrote:Francis, very good idea
Also ( not all styles? )

Code: Select all  Expand view  RUN

   oRBar:nGroupSeparation  := 0
 

This looks pretty too.. But I leaved mine as default to (:nGroupSeparation := 3), since the gap between group mimics that of Office 2016.

... about that in earlier . You helped me in that . The problem is that with more complicated PRG with some functions inside it's not working . So I leaved this question and now I want to wake up it now . As for a sample : #include "tdolphin.ch"#include "xbrowse.ch"#include "fivewin.ch"// ...

... to the first opened - "sales" - mdi child window . Then you will see that now you are on other record of sales orders , not that you leaved before opening "invoices" . This isn't a big problem . But undoubt ... :) . I'm using one alias - "sales" in all program ...

Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:What is the error? Try adding

Code: Select all  Expand view  RUN

#include "Hbclass.ch"

and remove <clipapi.h> and <fwharb.h>.

EMG

Thanks ... but unsucessful .. The same error as in the beginning . I leaved only <fwharb.h> . It works , but get errors on Borlands header _stddef.h .

... of own font from FWH application ... . The best solution - Unicode application . Sorry , but I don't know how to do that with FWH . So I leaved this question to Antonio - is any possibility to do FWH application as Unicode ? ADDED - searching through forum I found that : Antonio's answer ...

I'm talking about Przemek's technical opinions about xHarbour . The real facts why Przemek leaved xHarbour and moved to Harbour only. Do you want me to post some of his opinions ? Are you sure ? :lol: I have nothing to hide. If you think this is helping anyone, please ...

manuramos wrote:Enrico, I'm remembering, tree years ago,more or less, I modified some methods of TGET class, and I released leading spaces. It's running OK.

Sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying that you leaved or removed the leading spaces?

EMG

Rimantas,

Rimantas wrote:It seems that my olds FWH libraries ( 2.5 ver of 2004 October ) are buggies for that compiler . Antonio , as ussual , promised to view about that. But that was promise ... So I leaved with BC ++.

Its an old version and new Microsoft compiler versions. We can't make miracles, sorry

... ( 2.5 ver of 2004 October ) are buggies for that compiler . Antonio , as ussual , promised to view about that . But that was promise ... So I leaved with BC ++ . With best regards ! Rimantas .