Page 1 of 1
New FWH 2.7 February build
Posted:
Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:12 pmby Antonio Linares
The new FWH 2.7 February build is ready to be downloaded.
Please review the whatsnew section on these forums for all the new features.
New February Build
Posted:
Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:30 pmby TimStone
Antonio,
You said the new February build requires the Feb xHarbour, and you said it would not work with the Jan release.
xHarbour released the February build in January, and did not have a January release.
Does this mean it requires the upcoming 2nd February release, or will it work with the one officially titled February 2006 ?
Tim
Posted:
Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:42 pmby Antonio Linares
Tim,
If your FWH (February) application properly links with the xharbour that you have, then you have the right one. If not, you will get some missing external symbols.
xharbour introduced these changes before Harbour, so xHB February should be ok with FWH February build.
Error in linking
Posted:
Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:04 pmby TimStone
I get an unresolved _hb_dynSymSymbol
Is this FWH or xHarbour ?
Tim
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:45 amby dpaterso
I had the same problem but I found a temporary fix for this a few message threads prior to this one.
However!
Why has the default window background color changed from white to dark grey with this new (2.7 February 2006) release?
Regards,
Dale.
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:02 amby Antonio Linares
Dale,
Is it a MDI window ?
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:18 amby dpaterso
Hi Antonio,
It is the first (parent) window in a small test application defined as:
Define Window oWnd MDI
I have fixed it by adding:
Define Window oWnd MDI Color CLR_WHITE, CLR_WHITE
but I was just wondering why such a small thing would have changed and for what reason?
Regards,
Dale.
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:53 amby Antonio Linares
Dale,
We changed it by a suggestion from Enrico, who is a great FW expert, but it seems the change was not ok. We will review it asap.
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:57 amby dpaterso
Thanks.
It is not really a problem (unless something else is being affected). I was just wondering.
Put it this way - my rantings and ravings about the FiveWin ListBox Browse are far more important than the background window color
!
Regards,
Dale.
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:04 pmby Enrico Maria Giordano
Antonio Linares wrote:Dale,
We changed it by a suggestion from Enrico, who is a great FW expert, but it seems the change was not ok. We will review it asap.
From MSDN:
COLOR_APPWORKSPACE
Background color of multiple document interface (MDI) applications.
EMG