modharbour.club

[Otto]

Dear freinds,
It is a great pleasure for me to welcome our 300th member today.
For all those who do not know modharbour.club yet, I post the link again here:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/modharbour.club

Best regards,
Otto

[Erick Almanza]

good day
Master Linanes indicates that the mod-harbour is not functional

[Antonio Linares]

Only mod_harbour CGI is truly functional.

All other versions will crash Apache and the server itself.

You should trust what I am saying, as it is based on me and my team tests in a large company for three years.
And it became a nightmare until we decided to go the CGI way.

[Otto]

Dear freinds,
It is a great pleasure for me to welcome our 400th member today.
For all those who do not know modharbour.club yet, I post the link again here:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/modharbour.club

Best regards,
Otto

[Otto]

Dear Antonio,

The only problem I have noticed so far with Mod Harbour original was mentioned in the following forum post:
AJAX - DBF - Callback
https://forums.fivetechsupport.com/view ... 03&start=0

Otherwise, I have never had problems, and if I did, it was due to my error. For example, I use memowrit() for logging. I noticed that if the log files become quite large, using memoread() and appending can cause a timeout from the server. However, this is a conceptual error on my part.

I think it would be very useful if we could make all the versions—V1, V2.1, CGI—somewhat code compatible or unify the development into a single mod.

One thing I think, maybe not for the 60+ generation but for the younger ones, is the need for a web version of their programs.

Best regards,
Otto