FWH+Codejock RibbonBar

[richard-service]

Hi

Just test it and work fine.







Regards,

Richard

[NK]

Dear Richard,

have you an working Source Sample ?

Regards, Norbert

[richard-service]

Dear Richard,

have you an working Source Sample ?

Regards, Norbert

Hi NK,

yes, but some codes not from FWH's ActiveX.
We're modify new ActiveX for Codejock OCX.

Regards,

Richard

[norberto]

can you share?

[TimStone]

I looked at Codejock for the calender controls. It appeared to be a decent set of controls, and my communication with the techs was pleasant. However, they are unfamiliar with xBase languages, ie. xHarbour, and there was an issue of a clean interface to .dbf files.

We have several threads on this forum regarding Codejock and no one seemed to have worked through using the product in an application.

We'll be interested in seeing what you share on the subject.

[James Bott]

Tim,

How do they handle the data--as a recordset? We should be able to save a recordset to a dbf without too much trouble.

James

[richard-service]

I looked at Codejock for the calender controls. It appeared to be a decent set of controls, and my communication with the techs was pleasant. However, they are unfamiliar with xBase languages, ie. xHarbour, and there was an issue of a clean interface to .dbf files.

We have several threads on this forum regarding Codejock and no one seemed to have worked through using the product in an application.

We'll be interested in seeing what you share on the subject.

Hi TimStone,

Yes, Codejock Calendar will be make plan for us.
Now is working below:
Ribbonbar
Menu
Buttonbar
TaskbarPanel
StatusBar
PoupuControl
OutLookBar
SkinFrameWork

These controls support any Office style( 2000,xp,2003,2007 )

Regards,

Richard

[Ale SB]

Could anybody feel more details of how to work with FWH+Codejock RibbonBar?

Do I have to use some Lib?

Which tool should use?

Is it possible I to develop my own Themes?

Regards,

Ale

[TimStone]

James,

The interface directly to Outlook, or they handle the values in memory, or they write to SQL. The way they explained it to me was to either use one of their native data formats or capture the memory values and write them to the .dbf. That would seem normal but the correspondence indicated it is "theoretically" possible, but they had no examples of it having actually been accomplished.

I was going to work with it, but then the guys from noway indicated they were going to have their calendar controls soon so I decided to work with them. It just seemed it would be better, if possible, to use a product focused on FWH/xHarbour.

Tim

[richard-service]

James,

The interface directly to Outlook, or they handle the values in memory, or they write to SQL. The way they explained it to me was to either use one of their native data formats or capture the memory values and write them to the .dbf. That would seem normal but the correspondence indicated it is "theoretically" possible, but they had no examples of it having actually been accomplished.

I was going to work with it, but then the guys from noway indicated they were going to have their calendar controls soon so I decided to work with them. It just seemed it would be better, if possible, to use a product focused on FWH/xHarbour.

Tim

Hi TimStone,

yes, I hope so.
Your suggestion will be add our thinking way.

Regards,

Richard

[Ale SB]

Do I have to alter some thing in the class TActivex, to work with Codejock?

Regards

[richard-service]

Do I have to alter some thing in the class TActivex, to work with Codejock?

Regards

Hi

TActiveX can do Codejock's SkinFrameWork OCX and work fine.
Only problem is FWH's menu not working within Codejock's SkinFrameWork.

Regards,

Richard

[James Bott]

Tim,

>The interface directly to Outlook, or they handle the values in memory, or they write to SQL.

I'm still confused.

Why would anyone want to use a calander control that was linked to Outlook, since Outlook already has a calendar [that can be accessed outside the program]?

It would seem no matter how the data is stored on disk that they have to "handle the values in memory." What does this mean?

If they write the data to SQL, I would assume they use recordsets since it seems most SQL languages do use recordsets. Do they mean that they don't use recordsets?

Did they give you some kind of documentation about handling the data?

James

[TimStone]

OK ... the native handling of the data is 1) Outlook, 2) Access, or 3) Memory ( which can write to a binary file ). I dug through the information and finally came across the following information which is about the only thing that explains the linking to data:

http://codejock.com/support/articles/co ... r/cp_3.asp

That is probably the best explanation. My guess is that we could load the calendar data from a .dbf, and save it back to a .dbf. This would then allow people to access the same data at different locations.