Visual FiveWin from Manuel Mercado

Postby Antonio Linares » Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:00 pm

Manuel,

Many thanks for your excellent contributions, as usual :-)

Your application is with no doubt a very usefull tool and its source code surely is a great help for mastering FiveWin programming.

Regarding the designer itself, I see it uses the same model that Visual Objects used ("one way tool") which has a major problem: if the user wants to modify the form after the PRG has been modified with extra source code, this extra source code gets lost. Thats was the main complain about Visual Objects designer.

The benefit of using a resources file is, as you know, that if you decide to modify the dialogbox, you can do it, and it won't affect your existing PRG source code, asuming that a good programming style has been used in the PRG :-)

Even the "two way tools" implemented by Borland, have the problem that I describe above. They are not "clever" enough to detect what components names you have changed and where you are using them in your code, and how you are using them.

So meanwhile the computers don´t get smarter than programmers, we have to keep coding "by hand" as usual :-)

Its just my personal opinion, and we are open to listen all other opinions.
regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
User avatar
Antonio Linares
Site Admin
 
Posts: 42110
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Spain

Postby mmercado » Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:19 pm

Antonio Linares wrote:Regarding the designer itself, I see it uses the same model that Visual Objects used ("one way tool") which has a major problem: if the user wants to modify the form after the PRG has been modified with extra source code, this extra source code gets lost. Thats was the main complain about Visual Objects designer

Hi Antonio:

As i said at spanish forum, the final conceptualization of Visual Fivewin is 100% 2 way considering all of the project's components, including forms design and supplementary code.

Many thanks for your comments.

Best regards.

Manuel Mercado
User avatar
mmercado
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:50 am
Location: Salamanca, Gto., México

Postby Antonio Linares » Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:17 am

IMO we should first agree on the formats to use:

In order to save forms to files ("serialization") and later restore them, I would propose to use XML as it will provide us the greatest freedom to extend our "serialization" model as much as needed.

i.e. Mac OSX NIB files use XML (they are named .pList files: "properties list") :-)
regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
User avatar
Antonio Linares
Site Admin
 
Posts: 42110
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Spain

Postby StefanHaupt » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:48 am

Manuel,

vfw.exe is not working with XP64 or Vista64, is it still 16 bit ?
kind regards
Stefan
StefanHaupt
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Germany

Postby mmercado » Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:08 pm

StefanHaupt wrote:vfw.exe is not working with XP64 or Vista64, is it still 16 bit ?

Yes Stephan, the first action when retaking the vfw projet will be the 32 bits convertion (not dificult).

Regards.

Manuel Mercado
User avatar
mmercado
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:50 am
Location: Salamanca, Gto., México

Postby StefanHaupt » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:26 am

Ok, thanks
kind regards
Stefan
StefanHaupt
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Germany

Postby Eroni » Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:35 pm

Hello, if you interesting to convert to portuguese language, I can do that. I already did language conversion to other works, like xMate.
Eroni
User avatar
Eroni
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: Criciuma/SC Brazil

Previous

Return to FiveWin for Harbour/xHarbour

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Maurizio and 95 guests